[1]张同作,雷晓水,崔庆虎,等.两种新型方法防治高原鼢鼠的比较研究两种新型方法防治高原鼢鼠的比较研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(01):102-105.
　ZHANG Tongzuo,LEI Xiaoshui,CUI Qinghu,et al.Efficiency Comparison of Two New Methods of Controlling Plateau Zokor[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2007,22(01):102-105.
点击复制

两种新型方法防治高原鼢鼠的比较研究两种新型方法防治高原鼢鼠的比较研究()
分享到：

《西北林学院学报》[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2007年01期
页码:
102-105
栏目:
林木培育与育种
出版日期:
2007-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficiency Comparison of Two New Methods of Controlling Plateau Zokor
作者:
张同作1; 3; 雷晓水2; 崔庆虎1; 3; 巨海兰2; 郭德卿2; 苏建平1通讯作者苏建平。
1. 中国科学院 西北高原生物研究所, 青海 西宁 810001; 2. 青海省大通县森防站, 青海 大通 810100; 3. 中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100039
Author(s):
ZHANG Tongzuo1; 3; LEI Xiaoshui2; CUI Qinghu1; 3; JU Hailan2; GUO Deqing2; SU Jianping1
1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai 810001, China; 2. Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Datong County in Qinghai Province, Datong, Qinghai 810100, China; 3. Graduate School of Chinese Acad
关键词:
窒息灭鼠弹; 灭鼠雷; 防治; 高原鼢鼠
Keywords:
choke bomb of rodent control (CBRC);  mine of rodent control (MRC);  prevention and cure;  Myospalax baileyi
分类号:
S764.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用窒息灭鼠弹和灭鼠雷两种新型地下鼠防治方法对高原鼢鼠（Myospalax baileyi）进行防治。结果表明灭鼠雷的灭鼠率（86.65%）高于窒息灭鼠弹灭鼠率（59.64%），两种方法灭鼠效果差异显著（F= 96.47，P<0.01）；两种方法的春季灭鼠率(87.84 % 和60.39%)均高于秋季灭鼠率(85.45 % 和58.89%)；两种方法在退耕地、幼林地和撂荒地的平均灭鼠率(66.30%)高于灌丛和次生林中的平均灭鼠率(49.65%)。结论是灭鼠雷比窒息灭鼠弹更适于防治高原鼢鼠，两种方法春季防治优于秋季，在造林时间较短的幼林地效果更好。
Abstract:
The actual effects of controlling plateau zokor were compared with two new measures of choke bomb of rodent control (CBRC) and mine of rodent control (MRC) in forests between spring and autumn in 2002. The results showed that the lethal efficiency of CBRC and MRC were 59.64% and 86.65% respectively. It was obvious that MRC was better method in controlling plateau zokor than CBRC with higher lethal efficiency with significant differences in lethal efficiencies (F=96.47，P<0.01). The lethal efficiency of CBRC and MRC in spring were 87.84 % and 60.39% higher than those in autumn (85.45 % and 58.89%), as well as average lethal efficiency (66.30%) in grain for grass area, young forest area and secondary forest were higher than the average value (49.65%) in shrub and wasteland. It is suggested that the MRC had higher efficiency than CBRC. The optimal using season of these two methods should be selected in spring and the optimal forest type was young forest.

参考文献/References:

［1］张同作，苏建平， 冯俊义， 等. 退耕还林还草地鼠类调查及控制对策研究［J］. 草业科学，2005,22（4）8387.
［2］赵丰钰，冯俊义. 青藏高原退耕还林（草）地鼠害防治技术研究［J］. 中国森林病虫， 2003,22（5）1719.
［3］陈孝达，张学武，胡忠朗，等. 溴敌隆加增效剂防治林区鼢鼠试验［J］. 兽类学报，2002,22（1）3945.(下转第108页)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期20060410修回日期20060703基金项目中国科学院、中央组织部“西部之光”人才培养计划资助项目（110980150）作者简介 张同作(1972), 男,甘肃武威人, 博士研究生, 从事鼠害治理与生态学研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-05-04