[1]杨雨春,赵珊珊,包广道,等. 吉林水田防护林防风效能及其影响因子分析[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(01):132-136.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.21]
　YANG Yu-chun,ZHAO Shan-shan,BAO Guang-dao,et al. Effectiveness of Windbreak Forest in Paddy Fields and Influencing Factors in West Jilin Province[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2015,30(01):132-136.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.21]
点击复制

 吉林水田防护林防风效能及其影响因子分析()
分享到：

《西北林学院学报》[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2015年01期
页码:
132-136
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effectiveness of Windbreak Forest in Paddy Fields and Influencing Factors in West Jilin Province
文章编号:
1001-7461(2015)01-0132-05
作者:
 杨雨春; 赵珊珊; 包广道; 王君; 张忠辉*
 （吉林省林业科学研究院，吉林 长春 130033）
Author(s):
 YANG Yu-chun;  ZHAO Shan-shan;  BAO Guang-dao;  WANG Jun;  ZHANG Zhong-hui*
 (Forestry Academy of Jilin Province, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China)
关键词:
 ; 水田防护林; 防风效能; 相关分析
Keywords:
 ; paddy field shelterbelt;  windbreak effect;  correlation analysis
分类号:
S727.2
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.21
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 对吉林省西部水田防护林10条典型林带的结构因子和防风效能进行调查，分析了林带结构因子与防风效能有效防护距离的相关关系。结果表明，林带结构不同，导致林带的防风效能差异显著，并且依据防风效能将水田防护林分为3类：Ⅰ（3、4、6、8）、Ⅱ（2、7）、Ⅲ（1、5、9、10），有叶期防风效能（E有叶期）和无叶期防风效能（E无叶期）较好的林带分别为第3、4、6、8条林带.林带的有效防护距离是-60～160 m。第3、4、6、8条林带结构的防风效能较好。防风效能与林带结构因子分析表明，枝下高、β有叶期、β无叶期与E有叶期和E无叶期呈显著正相关，胸径与防风效能呈负相关，而且其枝下高、β有叶期、β无叶期适宜值范围分别为4~7 m、0.31~0.39和0.63~0.75之间，胸径的适宜范围为＜32 cm。
Abstract:
 Structure factors and windbreak effectiveness of ten typical paddy field shelterbelt structures in west Jilin Province were investigated. Correlations between the structure factors and effective distance of windbreak were analyzed. Windbreak effects at leaf stage (Eleaf stage) and windbreak effect at non-leaf stage (Enon-leaf stage) were determined. Due to the differences in structure，differences of windbreak effect of different paddy field shelterbelts were significant. The shelterbelts were divided into three categories: Ⅰ(3, 4, 6, 8), Ⅱ(2, 7), and Ⅲ(1, 5, 9, 10). The shelterbelts with the number 3, 4, 6, and 8 demonstrated high effectiveness of windbreak. The effective distance of shelterbelt was -60-160 m. In addition, correlation analysis showed that branch height, porosity at leaf stage (βleaf stage) and non-leaf stage (βnon-leaf stage) had positive correlation with Eleaf stage and Enon-leaf stage, while diameter at breast high (DBH) had a negative correlation with them, and its branch height, β leaf stage and βnon-leaf stage appropriate values were 4-7 m, 0.31-0.39 and 0.63-0.75, respectively, suitable range of DBH was<32 cm.

参考文献/References:

 [1]高素华,宋兆民,高桥英纪.林带的防风效能及数字模拟[J].林业科学,1991, 27(5):550-554.
GAO S H, SONG Z M, HIDENORI T. Wind protection effects and figure simulation of forest zone[J]. Scientia Silvae Siniae, 1991, 27(5):550-554.（in Chinese）
[2]宋兆民,孟平,张翼.林带的透风度与林网的防风效应[J].林业科学,1987, 23(4):398-405.
SONG Z M, MENG P, ZHANG Y.The permeablity of shelterbelt and the effects of shelter lattice[J]. Scientia Silvae Siniae, 1987, 23(4):398-405. （in Chinese）
[3]李永平,冯永忠,杨改河.北方旱区农田防护林防风效应研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 37(6):92-98.
LI Y P, FENG Y Z, YANG G H. Study on windbreak effect of farmland shelterbelts in dry farmlands of north China[J]. Journal of Northwest A& F University:Natural Science Edition, 2009, 37(6):92-98. （in Chinese）
[4]任中兴,房用,杨吉华,等.黄泛沙地小网格农田防护林网防风固沙和增产效益的研究[J].山东农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 40(3):398-404.
REN Z X, FENG Y, YANG J H, et al. Study on the reducing wind speed, stablizing sand and yield-growing effects of small networt farm-shelter forest in sandy area of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University:Natural Science Edition, 2009, 40(3):398-404. （in Chinese）
[5]徐满厚,刘彤,赵新俊,等.绿洲-荒漠交错带防护林与自然植被的协同防风效能及优化模式探讨[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(5):1224-1232.
XU M H,LIU T, ZHAO X J, et al. Study on the collaborative windbreak effect and iptimization configuration model of shelterbelt and natural vegetation in an oasis-desert ecotone in juggar basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2012, 32(5):1224-1232. （in Chinese）
[6]范志平,曾德慧,冀晓燕,等.农田防护林生态系统经营管理研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(4):81-84.
FANG Z P, ZENG D H, JI X Y, et al. Advances in management of farmland shelterbelt ecosystems[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2004, 26(4):81-84. （in Chinese）
[7]李锋瑞,张华,赵丽娅,等.科尔沁沙地人工杨树(Populus simonii)林生态防风效应研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(2):62-66.
LI F R,ZHANG H, ZHAO L Y, et al. Ecological effect of artificially established poplar forest against wind in Horqin sandy land of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 17(2):62-66. （in Chinese）
[8]张锦春,廖空太,满多清,等. 民勤绿洲农田防护林结构配置多样性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2008,23(3):53-56.
ZHANG J C, LIAO K T, MAN D Q, et al.Research on diversity structure installation of farmland shelterbelts in Minqin Oasis[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2008,23(3):53-56. （in Chinese）
[9]马国飞.河套灌区两种杨树农田防护林防护效应的对比研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2005.
[10]沈青叶.上海市崇明岛农田防护林优化模式研究[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2010.
[11]关文彬,李春平,李世峰,等.林带疏透度数字化测度方法的改进及其应用研究[J].应用生态学报, 2002,13(6), 651-657.
GUAN W B, LI C P, LI S F,et al. Improvement and application of digitized mesure on shelterbelt porosity[J]. Chinese Jouranl of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(6), 651-657. （in Chinese）
[12]曹新孙.农田防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1983.
[13]康立新,张纪林.护田林带树种配置评价与优化模式选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1991, 15(1), 46-53.
KANG L X, ZHANG J L. Evaluation of tree species depasitian in shelterbelt to protedt farmland anditg gelection of optimized model[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1991, 15(1), 46-53. （in Chinese）
[14]王葆芳,赵英铭,王志刚,等.干旱区人工绿洲不同农田防护林模式防护效应及相关性[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5):707-712.
WANG B F, ZHAO Y M, WANG Z G, et al. Sheltering effects of farmland puotective forest and their relationships in artificial oasis of arid regin[J]. Forestry Research, 2008, 21(5):707-712. （in Chinese）
[15]范志平,关文彬,曾德慧,等.东北地区农田防护林高效多功能经营的指标体系及标准研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(5):701-705.
FANG Z P, GUAN Z B, ZENG D H, et al.Indices and criteria of highly effective and multi2functional management of windbreaks/ shelterbelts in northeast China[J]. Chinese Jouranl of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(5):701-705. （in Chinese）
[16]张纪林,吕祥生.杨树护田林带疏透度模型及应用[J].生态学杂志,1993,12(5):56-60.
ZHANG J L, LU X S. Porosity model of poplar farmland shelterbelt and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 12(5):701-705. （in Chinese）
[17]姜凤岐,朱教君,周新华,等.林带的防护成熟与更新[J].应用生态学报,1994, 5(4):337-341.
JIANG F Q, ZHU X J, ZHOU X H, et al.Protective maturity (PM) and regeneration of shelterbelts[J]. Chinese Jouranl of Applied Ecology, 1994, 5(4):337-341. （in Chinese）
[18]梁万君. 吉林省西部农田防护林生态学研究[D].哈尔滨：东北林业大学, 2007.
[19]谭芳林,朱炜,林捷,等.沿海木麻黄防护林基干林带防风效能定量评价研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39(Supp.1):27-31.
TAN F L, ZHU W, LIN J, et al. Quantitative evaluation on protection effect of Casuarina equisetifolia shelterbelt in coastal area, Fujian Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Siniae, 2003, 39(Supp.1):27-31. （in Chinese）
[20]朱廷曜,关德新,吴家兵,等.论林带防风效应结构参数及其应用[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(4):9-14.
ZHU T Y, GUAN D X, WU J B, et al. Structural parameters of wind protection of shelterbelts and their application[J]. Scientia Silvae Siniae, 2004, 40(4):9-14. （in Chinese）
[21]朱廷曜,周广胜.农牧防护林网区域性防风效应及评价模型[J]. 林业科学, 1993, 29(6):509-514.
ZHU T Y, ZHOU G S. Regional wind protection effect and evaluation model of agriculture and animale husbandry windbreak networks[J]. Scientia Silvae Siniae, 1993, 29(6):509-514. （in Chinese）
[22]郝玉光,卢平.乌兰布和沙区人工绿洲农田防护林小气候效益与作物产量关系的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1997, 10(1):19-23.
HAO Y G, LU P. A study on the relationship of the shelter-forest mieroelimate effects on man-made oasiss and crops production in Wulanbuhe Sandy Region[J]. Forestry Research, 1997, 10(1):19-23. （in Chinese）
[23]向成华,费世民,汪万全,等.坡地防护林带小气候因子与作物产量的关系[J]. 四川林业科技, 1994, 15(4):16-23.
[24]封斌,高保山,麻保林,等. 陕北榆林风沙区农田防护林结构配置与效益研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2005,20(1):118-124.
FENG B, GAO B S, MA B L, et al. Shelter structure and effect of farm land shelterbelt in sand-drift area in Yulin[J]. Journa l of Northw est Forestry University, 2005,20(1):118-124. （in Chinese）
[25]于春堂,杨晓辉,李朝生.沙漠-河岸过渡带不同天然植被群落类型防风效应评估[J]. 水土保持研究, 2006, 13(1):118-119.
YU C T, YANG X H, LI C S. Effect evaluating of reducing wind velocity of different natural vegetation in desert- riverside ecotone[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(1):118-119. （in Chinese）

相似文献/References:

[1]李亚藏,梁彦兰,王庆成. 铅对山梨和山荆子光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(05):21.
　LI Ya-cang,LIANG Yan-lan,WANG Qing-cheng. Influence of Pb on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in Pyrus ussuriensis and Malus baccata [J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2012,27(01):21.
[2]张小咏,李佳,杨艳昭,等. 基于SWAT模型的长江源区径流模拟[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(05):38.
　ZHANG Xiao-yong,LI Jia,YANG Yan-zhao,et al. Runoff Simulation of the Catchment of the Headwaters of the Yangtze River Based on SWAT Model[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2012,27(01):38.
[3]杨红旗,陈广辉,王金林. PVAc改性酚醛树脂制备铝木复合材料研究[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.34]
　YANG Hong-qi,CHEN Guang-hui,WANG Jin-lin. PF Adhesive Modified by PVAc for Manufacturing Technology of Decorative Fiberboard with Aluminum Foils[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.34]
[4]江涛,李秀荣,谢延军,等. 微波预处理对巨尾桉木材渗透性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.35]
　JIANG Tao,LI Xiu-rong,XIE Yan-jun,et al. Effects of Microwave Pretreatment on the Permeability of Eucalyptus grandis×Eucalyptus urophylla[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.35]
[5]牛晓霆,王逢瑚,曹新民. 明清家具匠师原木下料的工艺原则及措施[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.36]
　NIU Xiao-ting,WANG Feng-hu,CAO Xin-min. Techniques and Principles of Log Cuttings of Furniture Makers in Ming and Qing Dynasties[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.36]
[6]吕金阳,覃卓凯,舒辉,等. 银杉木材构造美学价值[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.37]
　LV Jin-yang,QIN Zhuo-kai,SHU Hui,et al. Esthetical Values in Wood Structure of Cathaya argyrophylla[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.37]
[7]杨艳红,张海敏,孙景荣. 基于传统文化视角的现代家具设计探析[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.38]
　YANG Yan-hong,ZHANG Hai-min,SUN Jing-rong. Study of Modern Furniture Design Based on Traditional Culture[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.38]
[8]黄圣游,叶喜. 新中式家具“中式”传统的界定[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.39]
　HUANG Sheng-You,YE Xi. Definition of Traditional Element in New Chinese Style Furniture[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.39]
[9]韩维生,赵明磊,王宏斌. 基于阈限理论的设计尺度体系[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.40]
　HAN Wei-sheng,ZHAO Ming-lei,WANG Hong-bin. Design Scale System Based on Threshold Theory[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.40]
[10]宋杰,侯建军,申黎明. 按摩椅按摩头包覆层对按摩舒适性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):202.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.41]
　SONG Jie,HOU Jian-jun,SHEN Li-ming. Influence of Massager Coat Layer of Massage Chairs on the Degree of Comfort[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(01):202.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.41]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期：2014-04-23 修回日期：2014-07-04
基金项目：国家林业局林业公益性行业科研专项（201104040）；吉林省自然基金项目（20090254；201205065）。
作者简介：杨雨春，男，副研究员，研究方向：防护林经营。E-mail: yang-yu-chun@163.com
*通信作者：张忠辉，男，研究员，研究方向：森林生态学。E-mail: zzhgiszzh@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: