[1]安慧君,王硕,常峥,等. 森林质量模糊评价模型中赋权方法的选择——以红花尔基为例[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(5):167-171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.05.26]
 AN Hui-jun,WANG Shuo,CHANG Zheng,et al. Method of Empowerment Selection in the Forest Quality Fuzzy Evaluation Model:A Case Study of Honghuaerji[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2018,33(5):167-171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.05.26]
点击复制

 森林质量模糊评价模型中赋权方法的选择——以红花尔基为例()
分享到:

《西北林学院学报》[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2018年第5期
页码:
167-171
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Method of Empowerment Selection in the Forest Quality Fuzzy Evaluation Model:A Case Study of Honghuaerji
文章编号:
1001-7461(2018)05-0167-05
作者:
 安慧君1王硕1常峥12马妍12张智杰1
 (1.内蒙古农业大学 林学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010019;2.内蒙古自治区第二林业监测规划院,内蒙古 乌兰浩特 137400)
Author(s):
 AN Hui-jun1WANG Shuo1CHANG Zheng12MA Yan12ZHANG Zhi-jie1
 (1.College of Forestry,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot ,Inner Mongolia 010019,China; 2.Inner Mongolia Forestry Second Monitoring Planning Institute, Ulanhot, Inner Mongolia 137400,China)
关键词:
 模糊评价赋权方法红花尔基森林质量
Keywords:
 fuzzy evaluation weight determination Honghuaerji quality of the forest
分类号:
S718.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.05.26
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 基于模糊评价模型对森林质量进行评价,主要方法是解决各个指标权重的问题。以红花尔基森林资源二类调查数据为基础,探讨4种赋权方法对其评价结果的影响,分别利用层次分析法、主成分分析法、熵权法、专家直接打分法确定其权重,并比较分析不同赋权方法得出的权重值与评价结果。结果表明,主成分与专家直接打分法得出各指标权重结果大致相同,得出的森林质量等级均为Ⅱ级;层次分析法与熵权法指标权重结果存在明显差异,得出的森林质量等级为Ⅲ级。分析表明主成分分析法和专家直接打分法在确定权重方面较其他2种赋权方法更为准确,获得的评价结果更符合实际状况。
Abstract:
 Forest quality was assessed by using the model of fuzzy evaluation.The main issue of the assessment was to determine the weight of each index.Based on the second survey data of Honghuaerji,impacts of four weight determining methods on the results of the assessment were discussed.Four methods included analytic hierarchy process (AHP),principal component analysis (PCA),entropy weight,and expert scoring.Values of weight obtained from different methods and related assessment results were compared and analyzed.The results showed that the weight values calculated by the weighting method of PCA were similar to the evaluation results of expert scoring method,and the results belonged to the second grade.AHP method and entropy weight method gave different weight values of each index,and the results belonged to the third grade.The final result indicated that methods of PCA and expert scoring were more accurate than the other two methods,and more approximate to the actual situation.

相似文献/References:

[1]王金叶,程道品,胡新添,等.广西生态环境评价指标体系及模糊评价[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(04):5.
 WANG Jinye,CHENG Daopin,HU Xintian,et al.Fuzzy Evaluation and Evaluation Index System of Ecological Environment in Guangxi[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2006,21(5):5.
[2]李亚藏,梁彦兰,王庆成. 铅对山梨和山荆子光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(05):21.
 LI Ya-cang,LIANG Yan-lan,WANG Qing-cheng. Influence of Pb on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in Pyrus ussuriensis and Malus baccata [J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2012,27(5):21.
[3]张小咏,李佳,杨艳昭,等. 基于SWAT模型的长江源区径流模拟[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(05):38.
 ZHANG Xiao-yong,LI Jia,YANG Yan-zhao,et al. Runoff Simulation of the Catchment of the Headwaters of the Yangtze River Based on SWAT Model[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2012,27(5):38.
[4]杨红旗,陈广辉,王金林. PVAc改性酚醛树脂制备铝木复合材料研究[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.34]
 YANG Hong-qi,CHEN Guang-hui,WANG Jin-lin. PF Adhesive Modified by PVAc for Manufacturing Technology of Decorative Fiberboard with Aluminum Foils[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):170.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.34]
[5]江涛,李秀荣,谢延军,等. 微波预处理对巨尾桉木材渗透性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.35]
 JIANG Tao,LI Xiu-rong,XIE Yan-jun,et al. Effects of Microwave Pretreatment on the Permeability of Eucalyptus grandis×Eucalyptus urophylla[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):174.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.35]
[6]牛晓霆,王逢瑚,曹新民. 明清家具匠师原木下料的工艺原则及措施[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.36]
 NIU Xiao-ting,WANG Feng-hu,CAO Xin-min. Techniques and Principles of Log Cuttings of Furniture Makers in Ming and Qing Dynasties[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):178.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.36]
[7]吕金阳,覃卓凯,舒辉,等. 银杉木材构造美学价值[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.37]
 LV Jin-yang,QIN Zhuo-kai,SHU Hui,et al. Esthetical Values in Wood Structure of Cathaya argyrophylla[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):183.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.37]
[8]杨艳红,张海敏,孙景荣. 基于传统文化视角的现代家具设计探析[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.38]
 YANG Yan-hong,ZHANG Hai-min,SUN Jing-rong. Study of Modern Furniture Design Based on Traditional Culture[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):188.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.38]
[9]黄圣游,叶喜. 新中式家具“中式”传统的界定[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.39]
 HUANG Sheng-You,YE Xi. Definition of Traditional Element in New Chinese Style Furniture[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):192.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.39]
[10]韩维生,赵明磊,王宏斌. 基于阈限理论的设计尺度体系[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(01):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.40]
 HAN Wei-sheng,ZHAO Ming-lei,WANG Hong-bin. Design Scale System Based on Threshold Theory[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(5):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.01.40]
[11]罗贵斌. 汉中市中心城区常绿行道树综合评价[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(2):302.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.02.51]
 LUO Gui-bin. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Evergreen Street Trees Planted in the Downtown of Hanzhong City[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2016,31(5):302.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.02.51]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期:2017-11-18修回日期:2018-03-05
基金项目:内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2015MS0341)。
作者简介:安慧君,女,教授,研究方向:“3s”技术应用与资源监测评价。E-mail:dean6928@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: