[1]张捐社,高照良*.西汉高速公路工程水土保持效果评估分析[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(06):213-218.
　ZHANG Juan she,GAO Zhao liang.Valuation and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation of Xihan Expressway[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2011,26(06):213-218.
点击复制

西汉高速公路工程水土保持效果评估分析
分享到：

《西北林学院学报》[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2011年06期
页码:
213-218
栏目:
园林绿化
出版日期:
2011-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Valuation and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation of Xihan Expressway
作者:
张捐社1; 高照良2*
1.西北农林科技大学 思政部，陕西 杨陵 712100;2.西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨陵 712100
Author(s):
ZHANG Juanshe1; GAO Zhaoliang2
1.Institude of Ideological and Political Education, Northwest A&F University,Yangling，Shaanxi 712100，China; 2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Northwest A&F University,Yangling，Shaanxi 712100，China
关键词:
西汉高速公路工程; 水土保持; 生态工程; 效果评估
Keywords:
Xihan Expressway;  water and soil conservation;  ecological projcets;  assessment
分类号:
S714.7
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
按照《中华人民共和国水土保持法》及配套法律、法规、规定以及国家对水土保持、环境保护的总体要求，查阅工程监理报告、监测报告、现场抽样调查以及与监测部门、当地水利部门座谈等途径，对该工程水土保持效果进行了评估。结果表明：在水土流失治理方面，治理面积1 547.9 hm2，项目区平均扰动土地治理率为99.60％，完成水土流失治理面积594.0 hm2，平均水土流失总治理度为98.90％，土壤流失控制比为1.09~1.28，拦渣率为99.68%。生态环境和土地生产力恢复方面，植被恢复系数达到95.90%，成活率和保存率均达95%以上，植被盖度明显增加，公路建设中实现了物种多样性，植被的自然恢复达到预期的目标。公众满意程度好。
Abstract:
In accordance with “the Law of The People’s Republic of China on Soil and Water Conservation”, some relevant laws, rules, regulations and the general requirements for water and soil conservation, and environmental protection, the effect of soil and water conservation of Xihan Expressway Construction Project was analyzed on the basis of some reports of this project on project supervision, project check, sample survey and some discussions by the supervision department and local departments of water resources. The assessment results showed that management area of soil and water amounted to 1 547.9 hm2 and average management and hindering rate of land use was 99.60％ in the project area. The managed area of soil and water loss was 594.0 hm2 and the total average managed rate of soil and water loss was 98.90％. The controlled proportion was 1.09~1.28, and the rate of holding back sediment was 99.68%. The project could well improve the ecological environment and recover the soil productivity. The parameter of vegetation restoration was 95.90%. The rate of vegetation survival and conservation was over 95%. The vegetation coverage can clearly increase. There appears a diversity of species and the objective of the natural recovery of vegetation has been achieved during the period of the project construction. The value of this project has been realized. Finally, the public are greatly satisfied with this project.

参考文献/References:

［1］李明鞠. 西汉高速公路工程［J］. 人民铁路,2009(10 )：10. LI M J. Xihan expressway project ［J］. Journal of People’s Railway, 2009(10):10.
[2]水土保持规划设计的实践与发展编辑委员会．水土保持规划设计的实践与发展—中国水土保持学会水土保持规划设计专业委员会成立十周年纪念文集 ［M］．北京：中国水利水电出版社，2009.
[3]高照良，张晓萍，彭珂珊.粮食安全问题概论［M］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学出版社，2009. GAO Z L, ZHANG X P, PENG K S. An overview on food safety ［M］. Harbin: Press of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009.
[4]高照良，彭珂珊.西部地区生态修复与退耕还林还草研究［M］.北京：中国文史出版社，2005. GAO Z L, PENG K S. Study on ecosystem restoration and returning farmlands to forestry in China west regions［M］. Beijing: China Science Literature Press, 2005.
[5]陈学平，江玉林，李振宇．我国公路建设项目生态保护与恢复对策［J］．中国水土保持科学，2006，4(增)：107110. CHENG X P, JIANG Y L, LI Z Y. Countermeasures for ecoconservation and restoration of highway construction project in China ［J］. China Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 4(Supp.):107110.
[6]程彤．红壤丘陵生态系统恢复与农业持续发展研究(第二集) ［M］．北京：气象出版社，1998. CHENG T. Study on ecosysytem retoration and agricultural sustainable development in red soil area and hill［M］. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 1998.
[7]胡秀仁．城市生活垃圾堆放场植被恢复技术初探［J］．环境保护，1996(6)：1014. HU X R. Exploration of vegetationrepairing technology in the municipal domestic waste pileup place［J］. Environmental Protection, 1996(6):1014.
[8]李永红，高照良，彭珂珊.中国耕地资源保护与可持续利用研究［M］.北京：中央言实出版社，2010. LI Y H, GAO Z L, PENG K S. Study on farmland resource protection and sustainable utilization in China［M］. Beijing:Central Yanshi Press,2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]王利民,寸玉康,陈奇伯.滇西北高原水土保持生态修复措施的土壤理化效应[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(01):7.
　WANG Limin,CUN Yukang,CHEN Qibo.Effect of the Ecological Construction in Soil and Water Conservation on Soil Physiochemical Properties in Plateau Region in the Northwest of Yunnan[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2006,21(06):7.
[2]贺斌,李根前*,徐德兵,等.沙棘克隆生长及其生态学意义[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(03):54.
　HE Bin,LI Genqian,XU Debing,et al.The Clonal Growth and Its Ecological Significance of Hippophae[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2006,21(06):54.
[3]朱毅,韩敬.蒙山不同森林植被对水土保持效果的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(05):14.
　ZHUYi,HANJing.Effects of Different Forest Vegetation on Water and Soil Conservation in Mengshan Mountain[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2006,21(06):14.
[4]王京民,马浩,王蕊. 水蚀预报模型WEPP在水土保持评估中的应用[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(06):52.
　WANG Jing-min,MA Hao,WANG Rui. A Literature Review on the Application of Water Erosion Prediction Project in the Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2012,27(06):52.
[5]王紫薇,黄文哲,周阳阳,等. 泥河沟流域生态敏感性分析评价[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):210.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.06.33]
　WANG Zi-wei,HUANG Wen-zhe,ZHOU Yang-yang,et al. Integrated Ecological Sensitivity Analysis and Evaluation of Nihegou Catchment[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2018,33(06):210.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.06.33]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：20101117修回日期：20110324 作者简介：张捐社，男，讲师，硕士，主要从事农业与农村社会发展、农业持续发展及水土保持方面的研究。 *通讯作者：高照良，男，副研究员，博士，硕士生导师，研究方向为土壤侵蚀与荒漠化、开发建设与水土保持、粮食安全及农业持续发展。Email:gzl@ms.iswc.ac.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-12-31