[1]韩 雪,万晓敏,赵林森*.昆明金殿森林公园2个园区景观生态效益分析[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(05):259-263.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.05.51]
　HAN Xue,WAN Xiao-min,ZHAO Lin-sen*.Analyses on the Landscape and Ecological Benefits of Two Sections inside Kunming Jindian Forest Park[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2013,28(05):259-263.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.05.51]
点击复制

昆明金殿森林公园2个园区景观生态效益分析()
分享到：

《西北林学院学报》[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2013年05期
页码:
259-263
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-09-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analyses on the Landscape and Ecological Benefits of Two Sections inside Kunming Jindian Forest Park
文章编号:
1001-7461(2013)-05-0259-05
作者:
韩 雪1; 万晓敏2; 赵林森1*
1.西南林业大学 园林学院,云南 昆明 650224;
2.西南林业大学 图书馆,云南 昆明 650224
Author(s):
HAN Xue1;  WAN Xiao-min2;  ZHAO Lin-sen1*
1.Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan 650224, China;
2. University Library, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan 650224, China
关键词:
金殿森林公园;  模糊层次分析法;  景观效益;  生态效益;  昆明市
Keywords:
Jindian Forest Park;  fuzzy analytic hierarchy process;  landscape benefit;  ecological benefit;  Kunming City
分类号:
TU986.52
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2013.05.51
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于研究区域的AutoCAD图相关信息结合实地调查,运用模糊层次分析法和CITYgreen5.0软件,依据生物多样性、生态效益、景观观赏性和休闲娱乐功能4类指标对昆明市金殿森林公园中的文化景廊和水景园进行园林景观效益和部分生态效益的综合分析和评定。结果显示,生物多样性指标文化景廊8.03分<水景园8.67分; 生态效益指标文化景廊12.61分<水景园21.45分; 景观观赏性指标文化景廊33.33分>水景园32.10分; 休闲娱乐指标文化景廊23.60分<水景园23.77分。水景园整体得分85.98分,略高于文化景廊77.56分。
Abstract:
Based on AutoCAD graphic information and field survey, the landscape and ecological benefits of the “Culture Scenic Corridor(CS)” and “Water Landscape(WL)” Sections inside Kunming Jindian Forest Park were comparatively studied by means of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method and CITYgreen5.0 model. Evaluation indices included biodiversity, ecological benefit, landscape ornamental feature, and recreational and entertainment function. The orders of relative evaluation indices were as follows: biodiversity index, CS(8.03)< WL(9.67); ecological benefit index, CS(12.61)< WL(21.45); ornamental landscape index, CS(33.33)> WL(32.10); and recreation index,CS(23.60)< WL(23.77). The comprehensive evaluation value of WL(85.98)was slightly higher than that of the CS(77.56 ).

参考文献/References:

[1] 彭立华,陈爽,刘云霞,等.CITYgreen5.0模型在南京城市绿地固碳与削减径流效益评估中的应用[J].应用生态学 报,2007,18(6):1293-1298. PENG L H, CHEN S, LIU Y X, et al. Application of CITYgreen model in benefit assessment of nanjing urban greenbelt in carbon fixation and runoff reduction[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,18(6):1293 1298.(in Chinese)
[2] 蔺银鼎.城市绿地生态效应研究[J].中国园林,2003,19(11):3638. LIN Y D. Studies on the ecological effect of urban greens[J]. Journal of Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2003,19(11):3638.(in Chinese)
[3] 田国行,杨文峰,田超,等.郑州城市绿地生态效益与优化配置研究[J].河南科学,2001,9(3):300303. TIAN G H, YANG W F, TIAN C, et al. Study on the ecological benefits of yrban green kand in Zhengzhou and it’s optimum model[J]. Henan Science, 2001,9(3):300303.(in Chinese)
[4] 周志翔,邵天一,唐万鹏,等.城市绿地空间格局及其环境效应—以宜昌市中心城区为例[J].生态学报, 2004,24(2):186 192. ZHOU Z X, SHAO T Y, TANG W P,et al. Study on the ecological benefits of yrban green kand in Zhengzhou and it’s optimum model[J]. Henan Science, 2001,9(3):300303.(in Chinese)
[4] 周志翔,邵天一,唐万鹏,等.城市绿地空间格局及其环境效应—以宜昌市中心城区为例[J].生态学报, 2004,24(2):186 192. ZHOU Z X, SHAO T Y, TANG W P,he different urban green-land spatial patterns and their environmental effects: c case of the central district of Yichang City, Hubei Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004,24 (2):186192.(in Chinese)
[5] 菅文娜,张延龙.陕西关中城市街道园林绿化景观模糊评价[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(3):147149. JIAN W N, ZHANG Y L. A fuzzy evaluation of green landscape of urban street in Guanzhong of Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2006,21(3):147149.(in Chinese)
[6] 高冬梅,赵林森,魏开云.昆明市区几种立交桥绿化模式的景观效益评价[J].林业调查规划,2006,31(6):138142. GAO D M, ZHAO L S, WEI K Y. Evaluation on landscape effect of several afforesting patterns around overpasses in urban Kunming City[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2006,31(6):138142.(in Chinese)
[7] 高粱.基于层次分析法的绩效评估权重设计[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2007.
[8] 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988.
[9] 唐东芹,杨学军,许东新.园林植物景观评价方法及其应用[J].浙江林学院学报,2001,18(4):394-397. TANG D Q, YANG X J, XU D X. Study on the method applied in garden plant landscape evaluation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2001,18(4):394397.(in Chinese)
[10] 周本琳,鲁小珍.城市绿地生态学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[11] 刘文胜.昆明市宝象山墓园绿地部分生态效益研究[D].成都:西南林业大学,2011.
[12] 李锋,王如松.城市绿色空间生态服务功能研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):527531. LI F, WANG R S. Research advance in ecosystem service of yrban greenspace[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,15(3):527-531.(in Chinese)
[13] 刘江涛,赵林森.昆明市金碧公园部分生态效益及其抚育管理成本分析[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(4):214217. LIU J T, ZHAO L S. Quantitative analysis on partial ecological benefits and related tending cost of Jinbi Park, Kunming[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008,23(4):214217.(in Chinese)
[14] 张晓瑜,赵林森.基于QuickBird和CITYgreen的昆明市绿地效益评价[J]. 西北林学院学报,2011,26(6):204207. ZHANG X Y, ZHAO L S. Partial ecological benefit evaluation of green-space in the built-up area of Kunming City based on QuickBird image and CITYgreen model[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011,26 (6):204207.(in Chinese)
[15] 江高.模糊层次综合评价法及其应用[D].天津:天津大学,2005.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-01-24 修回日期:2012-03-26
基金项目:昆明市科学技术局科技合作与交流资助项目(昆科计字08H130105号)。
作者简介:韩雪,女,硕士研究生,研究方向:城市园林生态。E-mail:HanXue_2011@126.com *通信作者:赵林森,男,博士,教授,研究方向:城市林业。E-mail:linsen_zhao@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-09-30