[1]Àî·¨ºì,ÀîÊ÷»ª,Áõ¹ú½Ü,µÈ.Æ»¹ûÊ÷»¨Ò¶µÄ¹ÛÉͻ¶ÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨µÄÓ°Ïì[J].Î÷±±ÁÖѧԺѧ±¨,2008,23(04):62.
¡¡LI Fa hong,LI Shu hua,LIU Guo jie,et al.Effects of Visual Activities of Viewing Flowers and Leaves of Apple Trees on Human Electroencephalograms[J].JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY,2008,23(04):62.
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

Æ»¹ûÊ÷»¨Ò¶µÄ¹ÛÉͻ¶ÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨µÄÓ°Ïì()
·ÖÏíµ½£º

¡¶Î÷±±ÁÖѧԺѧ±¨¡·[ISSN:1001-7461/CN:61-1202/S]

¾í:
µÚ23¾í
ÆÚÊý:
2008Äê04ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
62
À¸Ä¿:
É­ÁÖÉúÎï¡¢ÉúÀí¡¢Éú̬¡¢Ö²Îï¡¢ÆøÏóµÈ
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2008-07-30

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
Effects of Visual Activities of Viewing Flowers and Leaves of Apple Trees on Human Electroencephalograms
×÷Õß:
Àî·¨ºìÀîÊ÷»ªÁõ¹ú½ÜµÈ
ÖйúÅ©Òµ´óѧ ũѧÓëÉúÎï¼¼ÊõѧԺ£¬±±¾© 100094
Author(s):
LI Faª²hong LI Shuª²hua LIU Guoª²jie KANG Ning HU Liª²hui
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
Æ»¹ûÊ÷¹Û»¨¹ÛÒ¶ÄÔ²¨ÇéÐ÷
Keywords:
apple trees viewing flowers viewing leaf electroencephalogram (EEG) emotion
·ÖÀàºÅ:
S718.53
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
ÒÔÆ»¹ûÊ÷Ϊ¹ÛÉͶÔÏó£¬Ñ¡È¡ÈËÌåÄÔ²¨×÷ΪÆÀ¼ÛÖ¸±ê£¬¶¨Á¿Ñо¿ÊÒÍâ¹ûÔ°ÄÚÆ»¹ûÊ÷Ê¢»¨¼¾½Ú£¬Ò¶×Ӻͻ¨¶äµÄ¹ÛÉͶÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨µÄÓ°Ïì¡£½á¹û±íÃ÷£º£¨1£©¹ÛÉÍÓл¨ºÍ½öÓÐҶƻ¹ûÊ÷ʱ£¬¦Â²¨¶ÔÈËÓ°ÏìµÄʱ¼ä½Ï±ÕÑÛ״̬ϾùÏÔÖøÔö³¤£¨P<0.01£©£¬mid¦Á²¨¶ÔÈËÓ°ÏìµÄʱ¼ä¾ùÏÔÖø±ä¶Ì£¨P<0.01£©£»¹Û»¨Ê±£¬mid¦Á²¨×÷ÓÃÓÚÈËÄÔµÄʱ¼ä±È¹ÛҶʱÏÔÖøÔö³¤£¨P<0.05£©¡£ÄÐÐÔ¹Û»¨Ê±mid¦Á²¨Õ¼ÓÅÊƵÄʱ¼ä±È¹ÛҶʱÏÔÖøÔö³¤£¨P<0.05£©¡££¨2£©¹ÛҶʱ£¬¦Â²¨·ùֵƽ¾ùÖµ½Ï±ÕÑÛ״̬ÏÔÖøÉý¸ß£¨P<0.01£©£¬mid¦Á²¨ÏÔÖø½µµÍ£¨P<0.05£©£»¹Û»¨Ê±£¬¦Â²¨·ùֵƽ¾ùÖµ½Ï±ÕÑÛʱÏÔÖøÉý¸ß£¨P<0.01£©£»¹Û»¨Ê±mid¦ÁÄÔ²¨·ùֵƽ¾ùÖµ±È¹ÛҶʱÏÔÖøÉý¸ß£¨P<0.05£©£¬µ«ÎÞÏÔÖøÐÔ±ð²îÒì¡££¨3£©²»Í¬Ñù±¾3ÖÖ¹ÛÉÍ״̬µÄ·ÅËɳ̶ÈÒÀ´ÎΪ£¬×ÜÌåÑù±¾£º±ÕÑÛ£¾¹Û»¨£¾¹ÛÒ¶£»Å®ÐÔ£º±ÕÑÛ£¾¹Û»¨¡¢¹ÛÒ¶£»ÄÐÐÔ£º±ÕÑÛ£¾¹Û»¨£¾¹ÛÒ¶¡££¨4£©ÔÚÈýÖÖ¹ÛÉÍ״̬Ï£¬¦Â²¨×ÜÁ¿ºÍmid¦Á²¨×ÜÁ¿¾ù³ÊÏÔÖøÏßÐÔ¹Øϵ¡£Î÷±±ÁÖѧԺѧ±¨23¾íµÚ4ÆÚÀî·¨ºìµÈÆ»¹ûÊ÷»¨Ò¶µÄ¹ÛÉͻ¶ÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨µÄÓ°Ïì
Abstract:
Taking apple trees as the visual subject and using human electroencephalograms as the evaluating index, the effects of visual activities of viewing flowers and leaves for apple trees on human electroencephalograms was studied in suburban orchard when apple trees were blossoming. The results showed that the advantage time of beta wave when viewing blooming and foliate trees with eye open lasted significantly (P<0.01) longer in comparison with the state of closing eye, while that of mid alpha wave lasted significantly (P<0.01) shorter. In case of blooming trees, the advantage time of mid alpha wave of the collectivity subjects lasted significantly (P<0.05) longer than foliate trees, so did the male subjects. Second, the average swing of beta wave significantly (P<0.01) increased in case of foliate trees compared with the state of closing eye, while that of mid alpha wave significantly (P<0.05) decreased, the average swing of beta wave increased evidently (P<0.01) in case of blooming trees. And compared with foliate trees, the average swing of mid alpha significantly (P<0.05) increased in case of blooming trees without significant gender difference. Third, the relaxation degree through the activities for collectivity subjects were as follows: closing eyes>with flowers>with leaves; for the female: closing eyes>with flowers, with leaves; for the male: closing eyes>with flowers>with leaves. What¡¯s more, a significant linearity correlation was also found between the quantity of beta wave and alpha wave through the activities.1

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

£Û1£ÝÐì¿¡¿µ. Ô°ÒÕ: ÌÕÇé¡¢ÐÞÐÔ¡¢ÁƼ²£ÛJ£Ý. ÑøÉú´óÊÀ½ç, 2006 (4): 49.
£Û2£ÝÖ£»ª. ±±¾©ÊÐÂÌÉ«Ðá¾õ»·¾³ÖÊÁ¿ÆÀ¼ÛÑо¿£ÛD£Ý. ±±¾©ÁÖÒµ´óѧ²©Ê¿Ñ§Î»ÂÛÎÄ, 2002: 8ª²11.
£Û3£ÝÖ£»ª, ½ðÓ×¾Õ, ÖܽðÐÇ£¬µÈ. »îÌåÕäÖé÷»Ó·¢ÎïÊͷŵļ¾½ÚÐÔ¼°Æä¶ÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨Ó°ÏìµÄ³õ̽£ÛJ£Ý. ÁÖÒµ¿ÆѧÑо¿, 2003, 16 (3): 328ª²334.
£Û4£ÝÖдå¡ÖÎ, ÌÙ¾®Ó¢¶þÀÉ. Ö²Îï(¥¼¥é¥Ë¥¦¥à¼°¤Ó¥Ù¥´¥Ë¥¢)¤ò¼û¤¿¤È¤­¤ÎÄÔ²¨ÌØÐÔ¡¢Ìؤ˦Á²¨¤ÎÁ¿¤ÈÖܲ¨Êý¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ£ÛJ£Ý. ÔìÔ°ÔÓÖ¾, 1990, 53 (5): 287ª²292.
£Û5£ÝYAMANE K. Effects of interior horticultural activities with potted plants on human physiological and emotional status£ÛJ£Ý. Acta Hort, 2004, 639: 37ª²43.
£Û6£ÝФ½¡. ÏÖ´úÉúÀíÐÄÀíѧʵÑé½Ì³Ì£ÛM£Ý. ±±¾©: ±±¾©´óѧ³ö°æÉç, 2006:111ª²114.
£Û7£ÝÁõÏþÑà. ÁÙ´²ÄÔµçͼѧ£ÛM£Ý. ±±¾©: ÈËÃñÎÀÉú³ö°æÉç, 2006: 52ª²56, 69ª²65, 91ª²93.
£Û8£Ý½ð¶÷Ò», ÌÙ¾®Ó¢¶þÀÉ, °²ÌÙÃô·ò. Ö²Îï¤ÎÉ«²Ê¤ÈÑÛÇòÔ˶¯¼°¤ÓÄÔ²¨¤È¤Îév¤ï¤ê¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ£ÛJ£Ý. ÔìÔ°ÔÓÖ¾, 1994, 57 (5): 139ª²144.
£Û9£ÝĪÇïÔÆ, ÀîÎıò. ľ¹¤¿í´øÉ°¹â»úÔëÉù¶ÔÈËÌåÄÔ²¨¼°Ö÷¹ÛÆÀ¼ÛµÄÓ°Ïì£ÛJ£Ý. ±±¾©ÁÖÒµ´óѧѧ±¨, 2005, 27 (6): 99ª²102.
£Û10£Ý¹ù¿¤ºÆ, ²Ì»Ô. ProdigyÐÍË«ÄÜXÏß¹ÇÃܶÈÒÇÁ½ÖÖ²âÁ¿²àλÑü×µ¹ÇÃܶȷ½·¨µÄÑо¿£ÛJ£Ý. ҽѧÑо¿Éúѧ±¨, 2006, 19 (11): 1010ª²1012.
£Û11£ÝÁúÔÀÁÖ. ÂÛÖйú¹Û¹âÅ©ÒµÐÍÔ°Áֵķ¢Õ¹Ç°¾°£ÛJ£Ý. ÖйúÔ°ÁÖ, 2001(6): 32ª²34.

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
ÊÕ¸åÈÕÆÚ£º2007ª²11ª²21ÐÞ»ØÈÕÆÚ£º2008ª²04ª²23 ×÷Õß¼ò½é£ºÀî·¨ºì£¬Å®£¬ÔÚ¶Á˶ʿ£¬Ñо¿·½ÏòΪ԰ÒÕÁÆ·¨
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2008-07-30